.
Feedback

Russell House: Historically Valuable Financial Burden

Palisado Green's graying, white elephant needs help.

The whole town is searching for the right answer to the Russell House conundrum.

In 1753 the Reverend William Russell, the minister of First Church at that time, had enough personal wealth to have master craftsman Timothy Loomis III build him a relatively grand home at 101 Palisado Avenue. The house stayed in the Russell family until 1953 when it was purchased by First Church and served as the parsonage for three pastors until 1995.

The building is historically significant because of its former occupants and its builder. The craftsmanship used in creating this home makes architects drool, and historians sigh when they think of the history emanating from the walls.

The problem is that the Russell House is 256 years old and is showing its age. Like any of us, it has foundation issues and needs a facelift. According to First Church, pastor Rick Huleatt, the bigger problems beyond the expense of restoring the property are maintaining it and finding a purpose for the building.

 “We have no intention of razing or destroying the house” said Huleatt. “We are trying to partner with the Windsor Historical Society to find a solution.”

The first step is to find out what needs to be done to preserve the building. With the help of the Windsor Historical Society (WHS), First Church was able to obtain a grant to hire an architect to look at the building’s sustainability. The architect’s report should be available this fall and will site necessary repairs and review the functionality of the building.

Maintaining antiquities is an expensive practice. Huleatt noted that the first priority for First Church is maintaining their Meeting House. “The Church itself is the most important piece of our campus. It has been our sacred space since 1794,” he said.

The cost of needed paint and windows for te Russell House is estimated to be between $150,000 and $200,000. Over half the funds will come from their small and aging congregation, but fortunately, First Church has received a grant from Connecticut Tourism for $82,000.

The Russell House also has tourism value as part of the entire Windsor Historic District. It would seem a natural fit for it to become part of the WHS collection, but the monetary challenge of the care and feeding of this white elephant on Palisado Green would be difficult to manage for the small budget organization

In January, a builder offered to move the Russell House out of Windsor. While a generous offer, it caused quite a bit of consternation to those who want to keep the historic house in town, if not in place. At a recent meeting, a suggestion was made to move it to another site in Windsor to free up the land for First Church, but even that is uncomfortable for preservationists. Plus the moving costs and new foundation would add $100,000 to the rehabilitation of the structure.

If the building can stay in place, another idea was that the property would be restored and used as rental office space for a non-profit organization. That use of the building would match up with the First Church mission of service to the community. However, the building would also need to be brought up to code to meet ADA and OSHA requirements along with town standards which would impact on some of its historic value.  

While the futue of the Historic Distric treasure is far from resolved, hope for its restoration and place in town is present, as expressed by WHS Executive Director Christine Ermenc is the Society's Spring Newsletter.

“Who knows – once word is out, a new idea or partner or white knight may emerge," she wrote. "We will continue to search for partners and funding and facilitate communications.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michele Vannelli May 19, 2013 at 12:12 pm
My understanding is that TC can't tell the BoE what to do. However, taxpayers can and should startRead More asking questions! In the past, I believe the majority of taxpayers (myself included) operated on the assumption that once elected, our local govt. officials will take reasonable care to do their jobs correctly and effectively, even if they have had some differences of opinion. However, that was THEN, this is NOW. NOW it appears our taxpayers are waking up to the fact (myself included) that the standards of what was expected, no longer apply. If you're not happy with how your local govt officials are behaving or spending YOUR MONEY ask questions, get involved, SPEAK OUT, and tell them as much so that come NOVEMBER when you decide to vote them out they'll know why.
John Dunn May 18, 2013 at 06:58 pm
The Town Council must demand that this grossly unpopular, carefully hidden from view of other BoERead More members, ( when being signed), the town voters and potentially illegal Contract be Cancelled before June 4th, the next Budget Referendum.
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:55 pm
Does any of you have your boss / employer / client PrePay Your Travel Expenses to Commute To Work?Read More Our Taxes are being increased to Pay for The Travel Expenses of the Chicago Shyster $20k per yr for a total of $60k to do a worthless study after firing teachers & closing a school - Remind your friends & family they still have 2 hours left to Stop the Waste of Money VOTE NO! & keep our taxes from increasing!
Albert Williams May 14, 2013 at 12:09 pm
me too
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:12 am
Michaela you would be a great asset on the BOE. Have you considered running in November? If you doRead More not want to run as an R or a D you can run as an independent. I would def vote for you and I know that Bob would do so too.
From left to right are Windsor High School students Allison Craig, Fatima Chadhury, Carly Sirota, Caitlin McDonald, Molly Curry, Tiffany Brown and Melissa Orzechowski.
Liz Yetman May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Way to go ladies! So many students at Windsor High School are doing really good things. Let's keepRead More hearing about them here on Patch.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:59 pm
There is still time to Vote NO!!! STOP the Tax Increase that will pay the Chicago Shyster $327,966Read More which contains $60k in Travel Expenses - why should our taxes go up so that a personal friend of a school board member can get richer while our students get No Benefit
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:19 am
It is important that we show up and vote NO for the budget. However it is just as important thatRead More this coming Nov we elect NEW PEOPLE to the council and the BOE. For that to happen WE MUST HAVE PEOPLE WILLING TO RUN! Voting No on a budget yet allowing re-election of the same group because there is no one new willing to step up to the plate is a waste of time, energy, and resources.