.
Feedback

School Board President: What Happened Was Unfortunate

Windsor Board of Education President Doreen Richardson calls for her colleagues to "rally around" an effort to improve students' performance and put an end to "actions that are disruptive."

On the heels of a Windsor school board meeting that laid bare tensions between its members and a division created by the hiring of Loyola University's Dr. Marlon James, Board President Doreen Richardson is calling on dissenting board members to accept the board's actions and rally around a community effort to get Windsor students on the right track.

"What happened [November 14] was unfortunate," Richardson said of the board's last meeting. "What were closing statements turned into a threatening, loud, contentious argument."

According to Richardson, since the board voted, 6-3, to commission Dr. James' equity and excellence audit of Windsor High School, its members have been split — board members have engaged in personal attacks based on the board's vote.

"Rather than address the merit of the decision, the opposition have resorted to personal attacks on those who support it," said Richardson.

"We must stop acting in ways that are disruptive and lead by example," added Richardson. "We must rally around work that has to be done, not around actions that undermine the integrity of the board."

The board has taken two votes on James' hiring — one vote to approve Windsor Superintendent Dr. Jeffrey Villar to enter into a contractual agreement with the Loyola University-Chicago professor, and another in an attempt to rescind the board's approval when opposition continued.

The board reaffirmed its decision to hire James with the second vote, but claims of procedure and bylaw violations have ensued.

Despite claims that Richardson and Villar led a push to hire James that was in conflict with board policy, .

The board is set to hold a special meeting on Tues., Nov. 27 with the potential to take action on the policy-violation claims.

While the commission of a project as abstract as James' proposed equity and excellence audit wouldn't necessarily bring expectations of full board support, Richardson has been thrown for a loop by the extent to which some of her colleagues have gone following the board's action towards a goal she says was outlined since she was seated to head the schools-governing body.

"My first speech to the board woas about equity and excellence. There was never any challenge around the proposition of equity and excellence," she said.

"We've had plenty of discussion about it — we brought in a consultant over the summer to understand productive board discussion and what it means to be an effective board."

Additionally, board members, Richardson said, had two opportunities to listen to Dr. James and his work — once over the summer and again in September when the board voted to commission his project.

Still, she said, she feels its necessary to correct misconceptions among board members and the community.

Foremost among the misconceptions is that James was hired to close the achievement gap.

"We did not hire Dr. James to close the achievement gap, as some have said. That is our job. His job is to create data and bring his educational expertise to the school, which will help us develop a response [to his findings]," said Richardson.

Richardson said she believes James expertise in teaching teachers and social justice will be particularly beneficial to the district's work to create a solution to fix an educational system that currently lacks equity and has limited excellence.

"Systems, in spite of themselves, despite intentions of individuals, result in inequity," she said.

"This is not a race-based or gender-based study," she added. "Whether you're black, white, female or male, we need to get down to the notion of seeing if students receive an equitable experience in our system.

James, she added, will help the district "understand the components to ensuring access to equity and excellence" and provide a solution that engages the entire community and builds the district's capacity for Windsor students to excel.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.