.
Feedback

Letter to the Editor: Misguided "Facts" and the Superintendent Search

Board of Education Member Christopher Watts expresses his thoughts on the process of hiring Interim Superintendent Ernest Perlini and the search for a full-time superintendent.

President Obama is a closet Muslim. Former President Bush knew about 9/11 before it happened. The Windsor Board of Education conspired to hire its interim Superintendent in secret.

You know, politics is a heck of a lot more interesting when there is a conspiracy to focus on instead of the real facts at hand.  Let’s be honest, most of the day-to-day business of running a town (or a country) is pretty boring. I dare anyone to sit in on one of my Board of Education Finance Committee Meetings and feel their pulse quicken. But unfortunately, in today’s Internet age, when anyone with a computer now has a platform to have their opinions heard – no matter how uninformed or misguided – what used to be just rumor whispered among a few, becomes “fact” to many. And these misguided “facts” cause harm.

It’s unbelievable what has transpired in the last month since the Windsor Board of Education started negotiating with Dr. Ernest Perlini to take the place of our outgoing superintendent Betty Feser. For those who have been reading the news, they’re aware that Superintendent Feser is leaving us to go to Milford and Windsor must hire a temporary (interim) superintendent to keep the chair warm and help keep the ship on coarse until we can find our next long-term superintendent. (I refuse to use “permanent” since the days of a town having a 30-year superintendent are long past.)

The challenges facing Windsor are many. First, if we want to do the hiring process right for our next long-term superintendent, chances are we will not identify a new superintendent until at least the fall. This fall is our municipal elections.  Knowing that many quality candidates would be leery of applying for a job not knowing who their bosses will be means Windsor should be planning on employing a temporary superintendent probably at least until next year at this time. This situation differs from the typical 3-6 month interim superintendent assignments that are usually out there.

Our second challenge is the fact that many other towns are in the same boat. The number of municipalities in Connecticut currently looking for a superintendent of their own is lengthy.

Third, you just can’t hire anyone. The person has to be certified by the State of Connecticut for the superintendent position. Very few people have this certification, so the pool from which to choose is pretty small.

So let’s add up our issues. We need a very long-term, interim superintendent and we’re competing with many other towns to find a good candidate from a very small pool of qualified individuals.  Anyone who has ever studied business in middle school knows the laws of supply and demand.  Just how many retired, state certified superintendents are out there looking for temporary employment? Add to the fact that Windsor needs one who can commit to serve for at least a full year and you can see that Windsor doesn’t have a lot of luxury to be choosy.

Now some members of our Board of Education and other members of our community have suggested that our Board President, School HR Director and other members of our Board have acted in secret to “anoint” Dr. Perlini to his new position. My colleague, Lucille Brown, has complained that we haven’t “discussed what we want from an interim.” My other colleague, Doreen Richardson, complained that we didn’t have a nationwide search for our interim superintendent, nor placed an ad in local newspapers looking for someone to apply for the job.

Truth be told, Windsor did not have months to debate what we want from our interim superintendent. Fact is, their job is not to initiate new reforms or major changes. They just have to steady the ship while we look for a new leader. Doing a national search would just be wasting taxpayer dollars.  It’s doubtful that anyone not within driving distance from Windsor would be interesting in moving here for a temporary job and it’s highly doubtful that they would even have Connecticut certification! And as for local newspaper ads looking for an interim – it’s just not how interims are hired anywhere, at any town. It’s not where candidates look and shelling out hundreds of dollars for those ads would be another taxpayer waste.

Despite all of these challenges, Windsor has been lucky enough to find Dr. Perlini – a man with over 16 years of experience running Newington’s school system AND someone who has experience handling a reorganization of the town’s elementary school structure – something that Windsor might be facing in the coming year. It wasn’t like we had any other candidates for the job and that our phone was ringing off the hook with applicants.  I am truly shocked that we were able to find someone as qualified and experienced as Dr. Perlini who was interested in the position.

Now, you can argue all you want about whether superintendents deserve to make the type of money that they do or whether retired educators who are collecting state pension should be allowed to go back to work while still collecting that pension. For the record, I can say I used to believe superintendents were overpaid, but after six years on the board I can say I have changed my mind. And with the pension issue, I think the rules need to be fixed to prevent so-called “double dipping,” but that is a state issue, not one a local board can fix.

When the Board starts its search for the next long-term superintendent it should (and will be) a national search. We will have many meetings to discuss the qualities and strengths we need to see in our next superintendent. The search process will be extremely open and you’ll see members of the public and business communities involved in the process. It promises to be protracted and painful, just like it was with Dr. Feser, but it will result in us finding the best fit for Windsor’s future. But on the bright side for you conspiracy theorists – that gives you lots of time to come up with new ideas.

Chris Watts is a Democrat who has served on the Windsor Board of Education for the past six years and is the former Vice-President. He chairs the Board’s Finance Committee.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
lhhs May 25, 2013 at 04:20 pm
Mr. Williams, you are absolutely correct, although it is not the entire BOE that's an embarrassment.Read More I am an Independent voter, but have always voted Republican when it comes to electing our BOE. All the Democrats seem to do year after year, is continue to add money to a school system that needs a complete overhaul! You are so right about the teachers not being able to teach. The administrators continue to disbelieve the teachers and are constantly taking the child's side. Giving rewards to children who are unruly, while the majority of students who do the right thing day after day get nothing, but wonder why if they are doing what they are supposed to do, they get nothing. When a child asks you if they start behaving poorly, can they receive rewards during the day instead of working, there is a problem with the system and when students are moved into a different classroom because a teacher is too strict or the child's parent isn't happy with them being disciplined, there is a major problem. It's about time the administrators start having a backbone and standing up to these students and their parents. We are doing these students such a disservice and giving them the worst lesson they could receive. Students need to be held accountable for their actions and learn to take responsibility. I dare any administrator to take the place of a teacher for one day and see the difficulty they endure day after day! This town is so top heavy with administrators that aren't doing their job. The amount of money spent for administrators that don't deserve a job is unbelievable, but the town doesn't have the backbone to terminate them but instead creates another position for them. Scores are never going to improve unless we start respecting teachers and holding our students responsible as well as their parents. I also do not believe that the budget will pass until Dr. James' contract is terminated. Residents are not happy that we, as taxpayers, were never given the opportunity to voice our opinion and have a vote on whether we wanted to put our taxpayer money toward such a study that has already been done and didn't work the first time!
John Williams May 25, 2013 at 10:02 am
This BOE along with the school system is a complete disaster. Having given them the majority ofRead More all tax increase dollars over the past ten years, it’s sad that we have continually seen the quality of education, along with State of CT standings in academics, fall lower and lower. I'm still trying to figure out how our technically new superintendent of schools was given a raise , fairly substantial, without showing to have overseen any improvement in our entire school system, while in fact, the State academic scores went down. I'm not sure how it works here in Windsor, however, in my multi-national employer, you are given merit increases based on performance...not what other employees are making around you. It is just an example of inappropriate spending. The BOE needs to figure out that taking teachers away, not that it really matters, isn't going fix anything, howerer, removing positions in house, ie: admin positions within the system, positions that were created in fat and robust times, need to be eliminated. It's really not that difficult. By the way, if anyone thinks money will fix our school systems...they are sadly mistaken. School begins in the home, teachers need to actually want to teach and not feel beaten down by kids whom do and say whatever they want w/o consequence, and lastly, our administration needs to stop looking the other way when it is time to discipline these disruptive kids who are creating a hostile learning environment. The no kid left behind thing wasn't meant to protect trash, it was meant to ensure everyone whom needed and wants an education gets one. The BOE is an embarrassment.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 10:39 am
$90k of taxpayer money to pay for a horse shoe pit should be used for a fund to help people fixRead More their properties, or to give scholarships to children or to maintain infrastructure....for the good of the whole. What a frivolous waste of taxpayer money.
Al Simon May 25, 2013 at 04:01 pm
@MaryAnn- why do I fight so hard to maintain public services? Because when you lose them to budgetRead More cuts, it is practically impossible to get them back (see Leaf pickup), both for the service itself and for the staff who did the work.
Al Simon May 25, 2013 at 03:59 pm
@Tim- the Fed grant money we have used for years for the housing rehabilitation program may noRead More longer be there for us (Heard of sequestration?) In fact, if we do not get the grant money this coming year, our ongoing efforts to improve housing stock may die completely, and our Community Development depart (which uses virtually NO Windsor tax dollars) may lose its reason for existence. That would be bad for our community.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 04:14 pm
I too grew up in this town, that is why I frequently visit a facebook site discussing all the warmRead More memories of growing up in Windsor. Those were good times.
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
lhhs May 25, 2013 at 04:31 pm
I am just curious, and I'm not trying to take anything away from Sage Park, but how many middleRead More schools actually applied for this honor. I know it says they were chosen from a possible 150 eligible schools, but how many took the time to apply? Does anyone have the answer to this question? It would be an interesting fact to know.
George Slate May 25, 2013 at 01:55 pm
Tim - It is good to see you commenting here again. Your comments are always calm, well reasoned,Read More and insightful, and add to a good discussion. I am told that the Windsor Public Schools (WPS) have longitudinal data so the best course of action, instead of creating that data (in summarized form), is to do a FOI request. I will wait on that until the budget passes. What you write I have heard consistently for 23 years. The problem is, if I am not mistaken, is that the State of CT does not care if the student has been in your system for a short time, or a long time. Also, the data that you mention can only be obtained by WPS staff since it would require information about specific students. I want the data out in a public domain so we can all look at relevant information.
Tim Curtis May 24, 2013 at 03:31 pm
George, Bill Generous has a good point, and that fact has a significant impact on test scores. iRead More know that one year the BOE did a study of standardized test scores at the HS, separating the scores of those who started in our system vs. those who came in later. The differences were tangible. I taught at East Granby High School. I don't know the exact number, but a very significant number of my students had been together since third or fourth grade. So they were exposed to the same vertical curriculum all the way through. Definitely not the case in Windsor where mobility is pretty high. Students come and go in Windsor. And sometimes they come back, making it very difficult to get the new students up to speed. I also point out that a number of my students started out in Windsor.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions