.
Feedback

How can the State "cut spending" and still need to raise taxes?

State budget explained. The state "cuts" spending and yet still has to raise taxes. How is that possible? An explanation of the 'budget' lie.

I think the readers should be aware of the biggest lie in State of Connecticut budgeting.  It is the term ‘to cut spending’ and it really means increased spending, yes ‘double speak’.  To you and me a cut means to reduce the last budget by the amount to be cut.  They spend $20B and they will cut spending by $1B, so the amount to be spent is $19B, right!  Not in Connecticut.  It means they may spend $20.5B and they will proclaim it is a cut from the “current services budget”.  You must be scratching your head.  A cut in your world is different than in the Governor’s world.  I know you want to live in his world, and we all DO, except we are on the paying (taxpayer) side of this equation.

As we know a few too many zeroes intimidates almost everyone.  So let me adjust this discussion in terms we all can understand. 

The way the State budgets in household terms is to take the costs, what you paid for insurance, food, clothes, utilities, gas, oil or natural gas, car payments, mortgage payments, life insurance, taxes, fees, repairs and maintenance, that trip to Disney World (Disney you owe me some $ for advertising ), and the Dunkin Donuts you bought yesterday (they owe me to), and every penny you spent in your household; The State then says it will cost more in the next year.  Some of these changes you know in advance, like your cable bill will rise because you had a lower rate the first year, or your electric bill will go up, and so forth, some may decline, car taxes might go down, and you want to go to Disney World and you don’t need to replace the water heater again this year.  Whatever the new amount of expenses becomes the “current services budget” in State speak.    Then when they talk of savings they talk of reducing the “current services budget”.  Remember it is an INCREASE from the “current budget”.  Notice the difference, because most do not catch that very important difference.

You spent last year $63,000 to live, not counting income or payroll taxes and employer sponsored benefits.  You expect your expenses this year the “current services budget” to increase to $67,000, an increase of $4,000.  Your boss tells you business is down, the State and Government mandates, the sick pay law, and some other things, causing higher payroll costs that do not directly benefit you, and to avoid layoffs, unfortunately, he can’t give you a raise this year.

You immediately realize you spent all last year’s money, AND your “current services budget” is up. You figure you can scrimp and cut expenses by $1,500 you would think like most that would mean you can only spend $61,500 ($63,000 (last year’s budget)minus $1,500) to run the house.  But in State speak it is $65,500 ($67,000 (current services budget) minus $1,500 cut).  To most of us that is an increase of $2,500 ($63,000 to $65,500), not in State Speak, its a cut.  Now go to your employer and say I spent all my income last year to live covering all my expenses, and based upon my “current services budget” I have cut $1,500 and you need to give me a $2,500 raise so I can balance my budget.  He would look at you as if you were nuts. Maybe he thinks it’s the new math that has you confused, the school system really failed you, as he thinks about what you said… cut $1,500 in expenses and then need a raise!  You see according to the State you are the employer, your employee the State is telling you that they have cut $1,500 from the budget, and they need a raise of $2,500.  What do you do?  Confusing isn’t it.

Remember as we increase taxes, and that will happen, more people will say enough and leave Connecticut.  You see, according to the State you are the employer, the State will take more out of your pocket, and as those expenses increase we will continue to see working people and retirees leave the State of Connecticut.  We watched hundreds of highly paid UTX employees leave for low cost North Carolina just this past year.  That took not only the direct jobs but hundreds upon hundreds of support jobs, and other businesses were negatively effect. 

Those left will be those that benefit from the system, but they can’t afford to support the system they benefit from by themselves.  That is the problem.  They need everyone else to pay in to be able to suck off the State’s teat.  As long as you are willing to accept higher taxes year in and year out the cycle will not stop.  The hidden problem is that people will continue to vote with their feet.  They will leave CT and those left behind will be stuck with a burden that will force more to leave and the downward spiral starts to pick up speed.  Unfortunately to right this trajectory will take much more effort versus getting our proverbial act together today and cutting the CURRENT budget and living within our means.

So when a State Representative or State Senator or Governor Malloy tells you they are cutting spending and still need to raise taxes on you or anyone, it is you, they are looking to take advantage of, in believing their “State Speak”.  Honesty is what we all should ask for.  Then again, if they were honest, you would realize what is going on and throw the people responsible out of office, and they would not like that!  So it is easier to lie to you.  You can choose to accept the lie or vote for a change in two years if you still live in CT.

R Eleveld February 15, 2013 at 08:08 pm
I added a letter the Governor sent to the Towns and some notations I made on the letter. A cut is not a cut?
R Eleveld February 15, 2013 at 08:28 pm
Local governments are starting to understand what is going on... Democrat and Republican City and Town Officials are complaining. Do you, the reader, understand how the Governor is working against your Town, at the same time he wants to make you pay MORE in taxes by shifting his financial tricks to you at the local level!
https://www.ctmirror.org/story/19140/mayors-accuse-malloy-hiding-cuts-cities

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann Overbaugh June 18, 2013 at 10:44 am
Oddly, in 90's, this achievement gap was alleged not to be real and not allowed to be discussed.Read More Betsy Kenneson brought it forth while she was on the BOE and was publically trounced for making such a comment at that time. A lot could have happened in the 20 years since then...I think it did. Most of the children that attended schools in Windsor now have friends of all races and are comfortable with all. And I have actually seen, white young men ask black young men to be their best man and black young men ask white young men to be their best man. Isn't that part of the point of diversity in schools? Maybe the achievement gap is due to not understanding and taking responsibility for your own achievement and future life.
R Eleveld June 19, 2013 at 10:01 am
I may be wrong but I do not think that "Debra Goldstein" showed up last night. At least IRead More do not think she spoke to the BoE. Can someone confirm this?
LeighAnn Tyson June 19, 2013 at 12:34 pm
I do not know who Debra Goldstein is, but I think I may have met "Avon Lady" based on whatRead More others have told me today. I do know that the 150 parents of color requested at the meeting (I was sent a text message first hand) and given already typed messages to read, may not have truly known why they were there as evidenced by the parent who tapped me on the shoulder and asked, "What is this all about?". It was very obvious to me that the NAACP has only responded to what they have been told by folks who've only been in Windsor for a few short years. I'm not sure that the data gathered by Loyola can be used because, in my opinion, the study was tainted before it began with his statements to the Hartford Courant in the fall. The entire "first do no harm" was done before the study even began. Once Windsor obtains the data perhaps another organization (Brown perhaps) can analyze and make solid recommendations. Regardless, I am very much hoping that my town can move forward and do what's right for all kids.
Avon Lady June 13, 2013 at 10:42 pm
Misfit June 14, 2013 at 03:18 pm
Oh please, I was a student of WHS, Sage Park and OE. If you pay attention and actually take schoolRead More seriously than maybe the child won't be on the 'lower track.' I'm sure I was apart of that track, but I went on to college and got my bachelors because I wanted to and because I no that in order to survive in today's economy, McDonald's isn't going to cut it. Tell your child to straighten up and take school seriously! It's not always about color!!
Henry G June 18, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Could it possibly be black and latino parents don't take as much interest in their children? ThatRead More they don't make them accountable to their efforts? Could it be that the teachers of Windsor are doing the best they can without being able to discipline your children? That's quite an accusation Debra - to blame this on teachers of Windsor! That's part of the problem of America right now..... blame it on someone else - rather than take accountability!
Avon Lady June 13, 2013 at 10:08 pm
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/allfiredup/2013/06/14/freedom-u-w-thelma-taormina - Discussion aboutRead More Common Core & UN Agenda 21
Al Simon June 19, 2013 at 07:59 am
I am sorry my initial answer wasnt clear enough. The expansion of the program is being eliminated,Read More not the current level of benefit. This would not have been proposed if we were not on budget #3.
Mary Ann Overbaugh June 19, 2013 at 09:56 am
If the town was listening to the "will of the people" the first budget would have beenRead More more realistic to what people feel is fair taxation.
Mary Ann Overbaugh June 19, 2013 at 10:10 am
Revaluation will formally be finalized in October 2013. This is another opportunity to raise taxesRead More and mill rate...so why did you make such slight cuts to this budget. It could have been a winner but I guess the Dems just don't think like that.
CatherineDennis June 11, 2013 at 10:01 pm
Another important fact came out in tonight's TPZ meeting. Anita Mips noted that years ago the townRead More created issues with her property regarding a waterway going next to her property and stated that is how she became involved in the Town. Interesting -that is the same reason that I became involved -I had issue with the way the town operated on a personal level and was appalled at the way things operated -so I too became involved. Dem's take notice -maybe once and for all you will stop discounting our votes as just get even upset people. It was good enough for one of your own.
Albert Williams June 18, 2013 at 07:28 am
I'm sorry it took me a week to watch this, but yes, job well done Mr. O'Brien and thank you for yourRead More dedication. The rest of the TP&Z didn't even blink to the concerns you raised, just rubber stamped it through - disgusting. I say a parking garage needs to be raised in downtown, that's the only parking answer, beyond that it's just another example of poor planning. 500 people from the theater, parking for numerous others visiting the other area establishments, grocery store parking, town hall parking, special event parking, train station parking, CVS parking, and then the heard of people visiting after throwing horseshoes in the $90k horseshoe pits...where are they going to fit? Sound like 10 pounds of "stuff" trying to fit in a 5 pound bag.
Windsor High School’s winning Operation Courtyard team: (l to r): Shanai Chambers, Kaitlyn Ali, Jeremy Fredette and Daniel Hammersmith.
CatherineDennis June 11, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Congrats to the students, their parents for instilling excellence and coaches. You make us proud.Read More Keep up the great work
Mary Ann Overbaugh June 11, 2013 at 10:18 am
Thanks for saying it better than I could have.
Aaron Jubrey June 13, 2013 at 11:26 am
Here are the facts: No, the people who built the horseshoe pits were not told the land would beRead More sold eventually. No, your backyard can not be made into a public park. The cost could have been far less than $90,000, however, times have changed and the town does not allow private individuals to construct the improvements. The group involved with the horseshoe pit put forth numerous alternatives to help defray the costs, and had an estimate roughly half the cost. The town put the project out to bid, and went with the low bidder. Once the sale of the land is finalized, the money made from the sale will have paid for the relocation of the horseshoe pits and it won't have cost the taxpayers any money. Mr. and Mrs. Cicero commonly make the (correct) argument that projects should go out to bid, and the most competitive bid should be selected. That's exactly what we did. Aside from the fact that one has nothing to do with the other, I have been very vocal about the need to find space for the robotics team. I have spent many volunteers hours with members of that team, and I have a great respect for that program and the students involved. I have asked the town manager, both publicly and privately, to do what he can to assist the superintendent in finding a home for Team Paragon. However, it really is a Board of Education issue. By the way, it was the town that stepped up and helped Team Paragon to find affordable, suitable, temporary space on town property until development begins on Mechanic Street.
CatherineDennis June 13, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Thank you for your comments Mr. Jubrey. I am confused. If town land is sold, and there is a profitRead More -it is still town money correct? Town money is tax payer money. My point is if tax payer money is spent responsibly for items truly needed by the town then we see less increases in tax over time (percentage) correct? I applaud your continued help in seeking a home for Team Paragon.
Skip Cashwell June 13, 2013 at 09:59 am
Thank you Nanette Fryxell for the link to "Teaching African American Students: A Look atRead More Instructional Methods and Cultural Differences." This should be mandatory reading for not only all members of the BoE, but also every member of our schools' staffs. Perhaps, too, Marion James should read this...he might be able to complete his (spurious) study now, and allow reallocation of the funds currently allocated to a meaningful use.
Jim B June 13, 2013 at 08:19 pm
Regardless of race, religion or other defining characteristics, a child's approach to learningRead More begins at home. Parents need to step back and instill a willingness to learn in their children. We made sure to read every evening tour children such that by the time they started kindergarten, they all could read fluently.
Nanette Fryxell June 14, 2013 at 09:20 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=yxZBUudFnNg