.
Feedback

The Number of Insured Connecticut Residents Increases

New data released this week by the U.S. Census Bureau shows the percentage of people lacking healthcare coverage dropped between 2010 to 2011 in this state and nationally.

 

For the first time in the last decade, the rate of private health insurance coverage for all Americans did not decrease.

New U.S. Census data released this week showed that the number of people with health coverage increased from 256.6 million in 2010 to 260.2 million in 2011.

In Connecticut, the number of unisured residents dropped to 303,000 in 2011 from 397,000 in 2010, according to CTNewsJunkie.com.

This means that 91.4 percent of state residents are covered, while 8.6 percent are not.

Citing figures from HealthCare.gov, the news website noted that the drop in uninisured residents can be attributed largely to the federal Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare as it’s known among the public.          

In Connecticut, 23,000 young adults under the age of 26 were allowed to remain on their parents’ insurance plans, the federal government reported.

But, as CTNewsJunkie also reported, it’s unclear whether the 2011 figures are stastically significant because Connecticut enacted in 2008 its own legislation allowing residents under the age of 26 to remain on their parents’ plans.

Read more about the U.S. Census figures here.

Here are some other highlights the federal government provided on the national Census data:

  • The percentage of people with health insurance nationally rose from 83.7 percent in 2010 to 84.3 percent in 2011.
  • The percentage covered by employment-based health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 55.1 percent.
  • The percentage of people covered by government health insurance increased from 31.2 percent to 32.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid increased from 15.8 percent in 2010 to 16.5 percent in 2011. The percentage covered by Medicare also rose over the period, from 14.6 percent to 15.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid in 2011 was higher than the percentage covered by Medicare.
  • In 2011, 9.7 percent of children under 19 (7.6 million) were without health insurance. Neither estimate is significantly different from the corresponding 2010 estimate. The uninsured rate also remained statistically unchanged for those age 26 to 34 and people age 45 to 64. It declined, however, for people age 19 to 25, age 35 to 44 and those age 65 and older.
  • The uninsured rate for children in poverty (13.8 percent) was higher than the rate for all children (9.4 percent).
  • In 2011, the uninsured rates decreased as household income increased from 25.4 percent for those in households with annual income less than $25,000 to 7.8 percent in households with income of $75,000 or more.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 20, 2013 at 10:08 pm
Congratulations to the students and teachers at Sage Park.
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Thank you for sharing the good news. Did you post this in your capacity as a Windsor citizen, or asRead More the paid communications consultant for the Windsor Public Schools?
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
Michele Vannelli May 19, 2013 at 12:12 pm
My understanding is that TC can't tell the BoE what to do. However, taxpayers can and should startRead More asking questions! In the past, I believe the majority of taxpayers (myself included) operated on the assumption that once elected, our local govt. officials will take reasonable care to do their jobs correctly and effectively, even if they have had some differences of opinion. However, that was THEN, this is NOW. NOW it appears our taxpayers are waking up to the fact (myself included) that the standards of what was expected, no longer apply. If you're not happy with how your local govt officials are behaving or spending YOUR MONEY ask questions, get involved, SPEAK OUT, and tell them as much so that come NOVEMBER when you decide to vote them out they'll know why.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:55 pm
Does any of you have your boss / employer / client PrePay Your Travel Expenses to Commute To Work?Read More Our Taxes are being increased to Pay for The Travel Expenses of the Chicago Shyster $20k per yr for a total of $60k to do a worthless study after firing teachers & closing a school - Remind your friends & family they still have 2 hours left to Stop the Waste of Money VOTE NO! & keep our taxes from increasing!
Albert Williams May 14, 2013 at 12:09 pm
me too
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:12 am
Michaela you would be a great asset on the BOE. Have you considered running in November? If you doRead More not want to run as an R or a D you can run as an independent. I would def vote for you and I know that Bob would do so too.