.
Feedback

Dollar Tree Vote Delayed Once More

The Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission postponed its vote on Dollar Tree's application for the second time Tuesday night.

After eight hours of presentations and questioning conducted over two meetings, everyone in the Town Hall Council Chambers Tuesday night anxiously awaited Windsor's Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission's vote on Dollar Tree's application to build its proposed one-million-square-foot distribution center.

But neither proponents nor opponents of the project had the pleasure of having their anxiety eased as, for the second time in less than a month, the commission decided to postpone its vote, citing time constraints.

As the clock approached 11 p.m., the commission voted to close the public hearing and hold a special meeting Monday, May 7, — one day prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission's meeting. The wetlands commission’s vote is needed for the planning commission to make a decision on the project.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Tuesday, town officials, the developers and members of the public focused their discussion on the presence and handling of pesticides found on the site, namely chlordane and dieldren.

To support the company's argument that construction on the Stone Road site will not contribute to a public health risk, Dollar Tree attorney Tom Fahey called on Patrick Bowe, director of the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection's remediation division, to share his findings and opinion on the potential public health hazard of pesticides found on the site.

Bowe's findings were directly in line with : levels of contamination on the site do not approach significant environmental hazard levels; and the project, being a development on former agricultural land, does not fall under the department's remediation standards and regulations.

Bowe said that Dollar Tree's plan to handle the contaminated soils are in line with the department's guidelines for projects that do come under DEEP's remediation standards and regulations, despite the lack of a requirement to do so.

Bowe and Fahey characterized soil samples taken from the site as having contaminant levels that exceed industrial remediation standards and regulations levels; however, they said, those levels do not approach qualifying as a significant environmental hazard.

A significan environmental hazard, Bowe explained, would be contaminant levels that are 30 times greater than remediation standards and regulations levels.

Dollar Tree officials and those from Clancy & Theys of Newport News, VA, the construction company hired to develop the site, said their contaminant-hadling plans include the use of impermeable barriers to separate contaminated and non-contaminated soils, monitoring the amount of contaminated airborne dust particles through the use of six dust-monitoring devices on the construction site, and utilizing water-spraying trucks that will dampen the soil, hampering its mobility.

Ed Lally, the project's engineer, was careful in conveying to commission members the practice of dampening soil would not contribute to increased mobility of the contaminants on site.

"These chemicals are soluble and have moved," Lally said, adding that dieldren and chlordane "are as soluble as your granite counter tops."

Despite Dollar Tree's presentation of its plan to handle the contaminated soils in ways that exceed the requirements set by DEEP, Tuesday's discussion left much to be desired for some.

The commission questioned the last time the site had been farmed, and asked how much of the site is still used for farming. A concrete answer could not be determined.

The effect of erosion and soil runoff on groundwater on site was also an issue of uncertainty that no one seemed able to provide a definitive answer to.

Another question for some that remains unanswered is a true assessment of the presence and danger of chemicals on the proposed site other than chlordane and dieldren.

When questioned by an attorney representing Save Windsor's Neighborhoods, a group of the project's would-be neighbors who oppose the construction project, Jeff Day, a licensed environmental professional for Terracon commissioned by Dollar Tree to analyze the site's soil samples, said there could be contaminants in the soil in addition to chlordane and dieldren.

Day added that findings in relation to additional contaminants had not been submitted to the commission.

Following Tuesday's decision to postpone the Commission's vote, Windsor Inland Wetlands Agent and Environmental Planner Cyd Groff said the extra time is needed for the office and the commission to analyze the new findings and information presented.

The Dollar Tree agenda item has been tentatively scheduled for May 7 at Sage Park Middle School.

The planning commission is scheduled to meet the following night in Town Hall Council Chambers.

All other Inland Wetlands items on Tuesday's agenda have been postponed.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:55 pm
Does any of you have your boss / employer / client PrePay Your Travel Expenses to Commute To Work?Read More Our Taxes are being increased to Pay for The Travel Expenses of the Chicago Shyster $20k per yr for a total of $60k to do a worthless study after firing teachers & closing a school - Remind your friends & family they still have 2 hours left to Stop the Waste of Money VOTE NO! & keep our taxes from increasing!
Albert Williams May 14, 2013 at 12:09 pm
me too
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:12 am
Michaela you would be a great asset on the BOE. Have you considered running in November? If you doRead More not want to run as an R or a D you can run as an independent. I would def vote for you and I know that Bob would do so too.
From left to right are Windsor High School students Allison Craig, Fatima Chadhury, Carly Sirota, Caitlin McDonald, Molly Curry, Tiffany Brown and Melissa Orzechowski.
Liz Yetman May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Way to go ladies! So many students at Windsor High School are doing really good things. Let's keepRead More hearing about them here on Patch.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:59 pm
There is still time to Vote NO!!! STOP the Tax Increase that will pay the Chicago Shyster $327,966Read More which contains $60k in Travel Expenses - why should our taxes go up so that a personal friend of a school board member can get richer while our students get No Benefit
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:19 am
It is important that we show up and vote NO for the budget. However it is just as important thatRead More this coming Nov we elect NEW PEOPLE to the council and the BOE. For that to happen WE MUST HAVE PEOPLE WILLING TO RUN! Voting No on a budget yet allowing re-election of the same group because there is no one new willing to step up to the plate is a waste of time, energy, and resources.