.
Feedback

Sequestration Could Cost Jobs at Connecticut Airports

Sweeping federal budget cuts are expected to affect airports across the country, including Connecticut.

*A previous version of this story erroneously reported air traffic control towers at Bradley International Airport would be subject to staff cuts under possible federal austerity measures. This article has been corrected to exclude Bradley from the six Connecticut airports named by the Federal Aviation Administration.

Should federal budget sequestration become a reality on March 1, it's not likely Connecticut airports would emerge unscathed, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.

According to the FAA, approximately $600 million are planned to be cut from the agency's current fiscal year budget, translating into a reduction in jobs nationwide.

The FAA has identified those jobs as overnight shifts and entire air traffic control facilities.

According to documents released by the agency, six Connecticut airports are on the list:

  • Sikorsky Memorial
  • Danbury Municipal
  • Groton-New London
  • Hartford-Brainard
  • Tweed-New Haven
  • Waterbury-Oxford

The six airports are and handful of the 100 air traffic control towers identified for possible closure. All 100 towers have fewer than 150,000 flight operations or 10,000 commercial operations per year, according to the FAA.

The direct impact of potential cuts are currently difficult to determine; however, "there could be a slow down in the air traffic control system." Bradley International Airport spokesman John Wallace said Tuesday by telephone. A slow down could translate into delays for passengers (for those airports effected), Wallace added.

Ultimately, the elimination of an air traffic control facility at Bradley would mean "less people doing jobs in control towers and more work to be spread around," Wallace said.

Bradley is not one of the airports identified by the FAA.

According to Jim Peters of the FAA, the agency is not currently releasing information beyond the announcement of locations subject to job cuts in the event of federal austerity measures.

FAA information released, however, is being accompanied by a letter from U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, which expressed the importance of maintaining safety nationwide.

"We are committed to working with all of you to manage the impact that these automatic cuts will have on the aviation system and on air travelers... Safety is our top priority, and in the course of implementing the operational changes... we may reduce the efficiency of the national airspace in order to maintain the highest safety standards," the letter reads.

LaHood and Huerta's letter states patrons of major airports, particularly New York, Chicago and San Francisco, could see delays of up to 90 minutes during peak hours due to the planned cuts. As a result, Huerta and LaHood said, airlines are expected to respond to the delays by changing schedules and canceling flights.

According to the letter, 47,000 FAA employees will be furloughed between one and two days each week through September. Additionally, the letter states the agency plans to cut back preventative maintenance nd equipment provisioning of National Airspace System equipment.

60 overnight shifts will be eliminated across the country, the letter states.

Furloughs and closures will take place in April, along with the finalization of details in the coming months, according to the FAA.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Michele Vannelli May 19, 2013 at 12:12 pm
My understanding is that TC can't tell the BoE what to do. However, taxpayers can and should startRead More asking questions! In the past, I believe the majority of taxpayers (myself included) operated on the assumption that once elected, our local govt. officials will take reasonable care to do their jobs correctly and effectively, even if they have had some differences of opinion. However, that was THEN, this is NOW. NOW it appears our taxpayers are waking up to the fact (myself included) that the standards of what was expected, no longer apply. If you're not happy with how your local govt officials are behaving or spending YOUR MONEY ask questions, get involved, SPEAK OUT, and tell them as much so that come NOVEMBER when you decide to vote them out they'll know why.
John Dunn May 18, 2013 at 06:58 pm
The Town Council must demand that this grossly unpopular, carefully hidden from view of other BoERead More members, ( when being signed), the town voters and potentially illegal Contract be Cancelled before June 4th, the next Budget Referendum.
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:55 pm
Does any of you have your boss / employer / client PrePay Your Travel Expenses to Commute To Work?Read More Our Taxes are being increased to Pay for The Travel Expenses of the Chicago Shyster $20k per yr for a total of $60k to do a worthless study after firing teachers & closing a school - Remind your friends & family they still have 2 hours left to Stop the Waste of Money VOTE NO! & keep our taxes from increasing!
Albert Williams May 14, 2013 at 12:09 pm
me too
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:12 am
Michaela you would be a great asset on the BOE. Have you considered running in November? If you doRead More not want to run as an R or a D you can run as an independent. I would def vote for you and I know that Bob would do so too.
From left to right are Windsor High School students Allison Craig, Fatima Chadhury, Carly Sirota, Caitlin McDonald, Molly Curry, Tiffany Brown and Melissa Orzechowski.
Liz Yetman May 17, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Way to go ladies! So many students at Windsor High School are doing really good things. Let's keepRead More hearing about them here on Patch.
Avon Lady May 14, 2013 at 05:59 pm
There is still time to Vote NO!!! STOP the Tax Increase that will pay the Chicago Shyster $327,966Read More which contains $60k in Travel Expenses - why should our taxes go up so that a personal friend of a school board member can get richer while our students get No Benefit
Malvi Lennon May 14, 2013 at 10:19 am
It is important that we show up and vote NO for the budget. However it is just as important thatRead More this coming Nov we elect NEW PEOPLE to the council and the BOE. For that to happen WE MUST HAVE PEOPLE WILLING TO RUN! Voting No on a budget yet allowing re-election of the same group because there is no one new willing to step up to the plate is a waste of time, energy, and resources.