.
Feedback

Dollar Tree: We Will Not Release Soil Testing Results

Despite admitting the presence of pesticides on the planned site, Dollar Tree representatives refused to release the results of soil testing it commissioned.

After four hours of discussion, questions, comments and rebuttals, the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission had little choice but to approve a request from Dollar Tree representatives to suspend Thursday's meeting and pick things up right where they left them one month from now.

There were no pivotal decisions made by the commission Thursday, but it was a night during which the battle between Dollar Tree, Inc. and a group of Rainbow residents took full form.

The group of residents opposing Dollar Tree's proposed one-million-square-foot distribution center were represented by legal counsel for the first time at a public meeting.

That said, residents were able to give Dollar Tree representatives a run for their money Thursday, revealing what they saw as holes in the Fortune 500 company's case for application approval.

The glaring hole exposed Thursday was the truth about pesticides found in the soil where Dollar Tree plans to build.

Zoned industrial since the 1950's, the site Dollar Tree would like to build on has actually been used for agricultural purposes at lease since the turn of the twentieth centure, according to farming maps at the Windsor Historical Society.

The agricultural history is not denied by either party; neither is the fact that the pesticides chlordane and dieldrin were found in the soil.

What is being denied is full disclosure of the results of soil testing completed.

When asked to reveal the results, Dollar Tree attorney Tom Fahey said the company has a non-disclosure agreement with Griffin Land, the current property owner.

Fahey added that the company will not release specifics of the soil testing completed on the site now or in the future.

He added that testing results were below that that qualifying for a significant environmental hazard, and that the project "does not need to comply with RSR," remediation standard regulations, givent that there has been no incident of extreme contamination requiring a report be made to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

With or without knowledge of the specific levels of pesticides found on the site, those opposed to the project clung to the fact that Dollar Tree is keeping information from the public, and many argued that the commission would be unable to make a decision on this application without facts that are germane to the purpose of the commission.

"It's clear why they're not releasing the results of the soil tests. They're bad." said Catherine Cicero, whose Stone Road home is directly across the street from the proposed distribution center site.

"Otherwise they'd be waving [the results] around," she added.

Both Dollar Tree and counsel representing Rainbow residents under the group name Save Windsor's Neighborhoods, took time to address the commission, and call experts up to the microphone in order to give testimony of their findings.

The commission's take on arguments presented were still unknown Thursday when the meeting was adjourned at roughly 10:30 p.m. Commission members' opinions on Dollar Tree's application will remain unkown until May 1, when the commission will hold its next meeting; commission members are barred from speaking about the application until then.

In early March the commission unanimously approved Dollar Tree's application, finding that their plans would have little impact on the wetlands in the area.

That decision was rescinded Thursday to allow for a public hearing, which will evenutally be followed by another vote.

The public hearing remains open and will continue on May 1.

Although Dollar Tree refused to release results of its soil tests and the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission has yet to vote on the company's application, Thursday's meeting can be taken as a small victory for the project's opposition.

Just days after an effort to force a town-wide vote and reverse the Town Council's approval of a 40-percent tax abatement for the company, Thursday's public hearing managed to delay the project for another month.

Dollar Tree expressed wishes to break ground in April, but with the project not coming before the commission again for another month, breaking gorund in the next few weeks won't happen.

The Dollar Tree project will come before the Town Planning and Zoning Commission on Tues., April 10.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.