.
Feedback

Debate Offers Insight into Probate Matters, Candidates' Personalities

Voters were given insight into the various personalities and approaches to probate law of the four candidates for probate judge during an evening debate on Wednesday.

The Greater Windsor Probate Court only serves families in East Windsor, South Windsor and Windsor, but it is utilized when families are at their most vulnerable moments in life.

That said, there are few candidates for public office for whom face-to-face interaction with the residents is so important.

Voters got the opportunity to meet the four candidates for probate judge Wednesday night during a meet-and-greet debate held at Windsor Town Hall, and, for the first time, voters were able to put experience aside and analyze the various personalities and approaches to probate law presented by the candidates.

The event, presented by the Windsor-North Central League of Women Voters, also served as an educational opportunity for voters, as it displayed the many nuances of probate courts that, over the course of an election, may have otherwise gone overlooked.

Discussing the technical details of the court's operations, candidates talked about everything from juggling full-time probate duties while maintaining a private practice to staff management.

"The staff of the court is key because it has been my experience that if you have a strong staff, the staff will be able to assist most people who come before the probate court to handle their matters without counsel," said Marianne Lassman Fisher, the Democratic party's endorsed candidate and former South Windsor probate judge.

"It seemed to me that the most pressing need for people who are going through the court is to get this stuff behind them, to move forward with whatever is happening with a loved one, and that staff has to be able to do that," she added.

None of the four candidates were shy about their experience in the court or their familiarity with probate matters, but it was Lassman Fisher (the only candidate to have served as a probate judge before) and Republican Kevin McCann who reiterated their experience the most.

"I have acted as conservator, as guardian. I've represented children. I've done the whole spectrum of probate law. I can bring that experience," said McCann.

The League of Women Voters' "Meet the Candidates Night" also served as an opportunity for the candidates to go beyond discussing the experience all four have with the probate system.

"We need to continue with the legacy of having a caring, compassionate court for everyone. Every single person who comes before the court should be treated equally. It should be non-political, non-partisan... It is a truly independent position," said Keith Yagaloff after describing the positive court reform achieved by the late Judge Brian Griffin.

Judy Paquin, who is also running on the ticket as an independent, stressed the importance of her party affiliation, saying, "I am an Independent candidate. I want my judge to be Independent. I don't want the political stuff anymore... I'm supposed to have [this position] because I'll make a better judge."

For the most part, when issues were discussed, the candidates seemed to agree with one another.

All candidates expressed a need for the courts to follow a uniform code of conduct and practices, rather than providing varied experiences to those using the courts.

All candidates stressed the importance of fair and equal fees for service.

All candidates said they plan to continue part-time operation of their private practices while serving as probate judge.

Voters will have the opportunity to elect a new probate judge during a special election held on Tues., August 21.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tim Curtis May 23, 2013 at 07:48 pm
Dear Michaela Fissel, You gave some very sound and concrete reasons as to the positives about livingRead More in Windsor. And I couldn't agree more. But then you become very vague about what specifically the differences you and your friends have seen in Windsor today. It would be very helpful to be as specific with the negatives as you were with the positives. BOE issues have been a part of Windsor, going back to at least 1984 when we first moved to town. Verbal shouting matches were not uncommon at meetings. But we've worked things out. My suggestion to you would be to visit the schools, talk to the principals and the teachers. Observe a class. Those were the people who sold us on education in Windsor, not the BOE. Tim Curtis
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions