.
Feedback

Dollar Tree Proposal Approved

Distribution Center clears the hurdles of town commissions Tuesday, getting its site plan approved by Town Planning and Zoning.

Windsor's Town Planning and Zoning Commission (TPZC) voted unanimously to approve Dollar Tree's site plan for its proposed 1-million-square-foot distribution center on Stone Road and International Drive, effectively giving the company a green light to break ground (save for a few loose ends that must be tied).

The commission made several decisions Tuesday, including a decision stating that Dollar Tree's construction will not pollute the public's trust in the quality of air, water or natural resources, and another stating that the company has submitted a complete application that complies with regulations set forth under town planning and zoning regulations.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The commission also voted to grant the company a waiver for the requirement to hire a landscape architect, provided they hire a professional such as an arborist or someone else with knowledge of the flora planned for planting.

The other waiver Dollar Tree was granted Tuesday was for the height restriction on lights to be installed on the property.

Dollar Tree's site plan first came before Windsor's TPZC in March with hopes of a speedy "okay" from town commissions and eyes on breaking ground in April.

Two months later, Dollar Tree, Inc. cleared the hurdles in its path, but certainly not without a fight from concerned citizens, who continued their fight Monday evening.

Those residents, many of them Rainbow residents and informal members of Save Windsor's Neighborhoods (a group of residents who will be the distribution center's new neighbors), were not allowed to directly address the commission Tuesday.

On the advice of the town's lawyer, Ed McAnaney (who is also Suffield's first selectman), TPZC Chairwoman Anita Mips announced that the commission would not "entertain any communications from anyone who wishes to speak on the site plan we have for 105 International Drive because we have a petition to intervene here."

Acting on the group's petition, Save Windsor's Neighborhoods' attorney Keith Ainsworth presented an argument to the commission on the basis that the development of Dollar Tree's proposed project would negatively impact natural resources present on the site, namely birds.

In particular, Ainsworth, calling on expert testimony from his witness, Michael Parks, vice president of Great Ecology, argued that the Dollar Tree's proposed activities would disrupt the environment to the extent that the native bird population, especially the savannah sparrow (a species of native concern), would be unable to carry out its natural behavioral patterns.

Ainsworth's argument proved ineffective, as Dollar Tree's attorneys, Tom Fahey and Carl Landolina of Windsor Locks, referred to the site plan they've presented, which includes landscaping and manufactured wetlands designed to increase the variety and number of food, water and shelter sources provided to local wildlife.

Ainsworth's aviary argument was a final stab at what could have been seen as an Achilles heel in the site plan.

To date, the attorney's arguments regarding the dangers of the site's contaminated soils, the potential for contamination of groundwater and the affect on surrounding wetlands failed to sway those sitting on town boards and commissions.

Residents' pleas for plans with what they see as having less of an impact on their quality of life and property value were unsuccessful as well.

"I'm extremely disappointed," said Bob Wallick, a Stone Road resident. "I'm disappointed because there were certain things on the site plan that were not addressed, such as the 150-foot buffer required by town statute between any turnaround parking lot and the nearest property line. That's been violated and the fact that they allowed a waver for the landscape architect bothers me because a landscape architect takes into account a lot of things that they're actually voting on, such as the lighting, aesthetics and how it's going to impact the property values."

For many of the Windsor residents who live next to or around the corner from the roughly 93 acres of land Dollar Tree will develop, the disappointment is shared, but it extends far beyond the Tuesday's approval handed down by Town Planning and Zoning.

For Stone Road resident Deborah Bologna, the disappointment can be traced all the way back to a meeting at the Rainbow Fire House, to which some of the residents in the area were invited by Dollar Tree and the project's engineer, Ed Lally.

"The invitation to a select group of individuals for the Dollar Tree presentation at the fire house was nothing more than a fishing expedition to find out what the opposition was," Bologna said about the meeting to which many residents complained they never received an invitation to, and only learned of the project from a neighbor or when it appeared before the Town Council.

"I think this is an irresponsible development. I think it's in the wrong place," Bologna added, Tuesday. "None of us here spoke out and said 'You can't develop this.' We wanted to work with the town and the applicant."

According to both Bologna and Wallick, while the Town Planning and Zoning Commission essentially ruled Ainsworth's argument to be outside of the commission's purview, there are issued directly related to the site plan that the commission should have taken into account when making their decision.

"Stone Road is a very small, two-lane, country road. It is not suited to tractor trailer traffic. In fact, we have a weight restriction — that wasn't even brought up tonight," said Bologna. "You can't accomodate the traffic that we will end up with. We're going to have 150 tractor trailers on our roads."

In Wallick's view, residents could have had increased access to plans regarding a project with the potential to change their quality of life.

Plans are available at Town Hall, but for himself, and many of the other families in the neighborhood, getting down to town hall to review plans and learn about the potential changes to their neighborhood during town hall hours isn't feasible, he said.

"With today's technology, why couldn't those things have been posted on the Website for the Town, allowing us adequate time to look at it when we have the ability?," Wallick asked.

The Town Planning and Zoning Commission's decision is pending review of the company's plans to bury and contain in a plastic membrane-like structure the contaminated soils.

Windsor Environmental Planner Cyd Groff, TPZC members said, has requested she be able to review the possibility for trees planted atop the membrane device to grow roots through its surface, releasing the contaminated soil.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 10:39 am
$90k of taxpayer money to pay for a horse shoe pit should be used for a fund to help people fixRead More their properties, or to give scholarships to children or to maintain infrastructure....for the good of the whole. What a frivolous waste of taxpayer money.
George Slate May 24, 2013 at 10:34 am
Earlier this week I sent copies of your Patch comment, and my come back comment, regarding theRead More Newsweek ranking of High Schools in the USA, to Dr. Villar's assistant. Yesterday I got back a message that includes, in part, "I have attached WHS’s application to Newsweek America’s Best High Schools 2013 as requested. Also, please see Dr. Villar’s comments below regarding the application:" Since I did this for your benefit, please call me, my phone number is published, give me an E-mail address to send this to, and I (all of us in Patch land) look forward to your analysis of the application. Thank you, in advance, for your service in this regard.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 04:14 pm
I too grew up in this town, that is why I frequently visit a facebook site discussing all the warmRead More memories of growing up in Windsor. Those were good times.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 04:13 pm
Hillary, some posts were changed ....the original told me this was a school post and that myRead More comments were out of place.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 01:35 pm
There are some who remember the town doing leaf pick-up and free garbage service.
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
Tim Curtis May 24, 2013 at 03:31 pm
George, Bill Generous has a good point, and that fact has a significant impact on test scores. iRead More know that one year the BOE did a study of standardized test scores at the HS, separating the scores of those who started in our system vs. those who came in later. The differences were tangible. I taught at East Granby High School. I don't know the exact number, but a very significant number of my students had been together since third or fourth grade. So they were exposed to the same vertical curriculum all the way through. Definitely not the case in Windsor where mobility is pretty high. Students come and go in Windsor. And sometimes they come back, making it very difficult to get the new students up to speed. I also point out that a number of my students started out in Windsor.
Al Simon May 24, 2013 at 08:38 am
It is an excellent question. Maybe we should study it? Oh, wait.....
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions