.
Feedback

Kennedy Relative Michael Skakel Denied Parole in Moxley Murder

Ethel Kennedy's nephew was convicted in 2002 of murdering Martha Moxley in 1975.

 

Michael Skakel, a member of the famous Kennedy family who is serving 20 years to life in prison after being convicted of murder, was denied parole at a hearing Wednesday morning.

The three-member Board of Pardons & Paroles questioned Skakel for just under two hours in the hearing at MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution in Suffield, CT, where he is serving his sentence.

Skakel, 52, is the nephew of the late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's widow, Ethel (Skakel) Kennedy. He was convicted in 2002 of killing 15-year-old Martha Moxley with a golf club in Greenwich, CT in 1975.

After nearly a quarter-century, Skakel was indicted for the murder in June 2000. A highly-publicized trial resulted in his conviction on June 7, 2002; during his sentencing hearing, pleas for leniency from Ethel Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. were read, citing childhood neglect and abuse from his father, Rushton Skakel, as well as dyslexia.

Skakel has steadfastly proclaimed his innocence since his arrest, and did so again Wednesday.

"Almost 37 years ago today, Martha was tragically murdered," he said. "The best chance of getting parole would be to admit this crime - but I did not commit this crime."

Skakel referred numerous times to his commitment to sobriety, which he says came on Oct. 25, 1982. 

"As a recovering man, I cannot bear false witness aginst myself, but I pray every day that whoever did this crime comes to justice," he said. "Tomorrow marks my 30th year of sobriety - how can a guilty man stay sober that long with that kind of guilt on their mind?"

Skakel spoke about his son, who is now 13 years old.

"Every day I'm praying to God that I can get home to my boy," he said. "He's proved to me that God does exist. I had the first three years of his life to be with him, and it was unbelievable."

Four members of Moxley's family spoke in favor of Skakel's continued incarceration.

"I believe Michael is representative of the most dangerous aspects of our society," said John Moxley, Martha's brother. "Michael should be incarcerated for the balance of his life."

Moxley's mother, Dorthy, said she sympathized with Skakel for his dyslexia, but that he should not use that as an excuse for what he has been convicted of doing.

"I have sympathy for Michael, because I am also dyslexic, but it never drove me to do the things he's done," she said. "Martha, my baby, will never have a life. To lose a child is the worst thing in the world. I pray nothing happens to your child. He should serve his 20 years, and then maybe he'll do something wonderful."

The panel deliberated for 45 minutes before returning with the decision to deny parole to Skakel.

"Your release is incompatible with the welfare of society," parole board chair Erika Tindill said. Skakel bowed his head, then turned to a group of 10 family members and supporters behind him and patted his heart before being led back to his cell.

Skakel is eligible to apply for parole again in Oct. 2017.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tim Curtis May 23, 2013 at 07:48 pm
Dear Michaela Fissel, You gave some very sound and concrete reasons as to the positives about livingRead More in Windsor. And I couldn't agree more. But then you become very vague about what specifically the differences you and your friends have seen in Windsor today. It would be very helpful to be as specific with the negatives as you were with the positives. BOE issues have been a part of Windsor, going back to at least 1984 when we first moved to town. Verbal shouting matches were not uncommon at meetings. But we've worked things out. My suggestion to you would be to visit the schools, talk to the principals and the teachers. Observe a class. Those were the people who sold us on education in Windsor, not the BOE. Tim Curtis
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions