.
Feedback

Hard Times for the Fans? Nobody Cares

There are many news organizations that can tell you exactly what the players and owners are saying to each other. I will tell you what they are not talking about. They are not talking about you. They don’t care about you.

My brother-in-law took me to my first big league baseball game. The A’s played the Red Sox at Fenway Park and Fred Lynn made a fine catch in the triangle right below our seats.

To give me this memory, my brother-in-law endured a two-hour drive with an 8-year old kid who kept shouting, “Sign ahead,” at every posted speed limit because his mom had warned him to pay special attention to the confusing Boston road signs.

What he didn’t have to endure was coughing up an entire paycheck to get us into the game.

In 1976, a fan could buy a bleacher seat at Fenway Park for $1. If you type $1 into an inflation calculator, you will discover a bleacher seat should cost $3.79 today. Call it four bucks if you want.

The seat now costs $28.

A family of four, who should be paying $16 to sit down, are actually paying more than $100 to watch some 440-feet from home plate. The major difference between then and now is that in 1975 Hall-of-Famer Carl Yastrzemski made $175,000, which is about $700,000 in today’s money, while today, the Red Sox are paying $700,000 to part-time catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia.

Yaz is a baseball immortal. Saltalamacchia has a long last name.

This is too often forgotten in sports and is worth mentioning because the National Football League is shuttered as players and owners decide how best to cut up $9 billion of our money. Also, the National Basketball Association is locked down as owners try to undue the negotiating mistakes of their past and the players try to avoid concessions and givebacks.

There are many news organizations that can tell you exactly what the players and owners are saying to each other. I will tell you what they are not talking about. They are not talking about you. They don’t care about you.

In our state, the governor and voters and state employee unions are at each other’s throats while towns from Tolland to Enfield try to figure out how to educate kids and curtail school budgets at the same time.

In real life families lurch from one paycheck to the next never certain if their health insurance will be gone when the next round of layoffs come, which is what makes even the historically low tax rate unbearable.

In real life, too many families can’t afford the trip my brother-in-law took me on all those years ago.

Going to a sporting event has become something you do special for Timmy’s 10th birthday. You count on dropping at least $200 (even if you buy your tickets on the cheap from a secondary vendor) and you pray you're not seated next to some foul-mouthed lout who ruins the entire afternoon. You pray little Timmy has a good time because you’re not coming back until he’s 12, that is, if he isn’t more interested in the X-Games by then.

But neither the players, owners, nor, too often, the people who cover them live in the real world. There was a laughable column recently on ESPN talking about how many of the players aren’t well off like we all think because some of them only make the minimum $325,000.

Oh, the horror.

So yes, by all means, let’s hear more about the difficulty of slicing up a $9 billion pie in the NFL. Let’s hear about the struggles of the NBA owners as the Knicks prepare to raise their ticket prices from an average of $88 to an average of somewhere near $130.

The word for the NFL negotiations is unseemly. The word for the NBA negotiations is absurd.

Neither owners nor players will ever say, “You know what, we both have enough money but we’re pricing people out of the stadium. Let’s each give back a little and lower ticket prices.” Not a single NFL player has said anything about my inability to afford a personal seat license, which means in the coming years my son will have to be content watching men slowly destroy their bodies and brains on the television with the rest of us.

At ESPN, their unending roster of former players turned analysts seem genuinely mystified by fan resentment toward millionaire players upset by their poor healthcare plans and lackluster pensions.

Well, fellas, I’m here to explain it to you.

In 1975, the average Major League baseball player made $44,676. In 2002, the average big leaguer made $2,385,903.07. Adjusted for inflation that represents a salary increase of some $2.2 million dollars. Meanwhile, the average salary of Americans in 1975 was $8,630.92. In 2009, it was $40,711, which was down in real dollars from 2008.

Put another way, the average American makes about 4.7 times what he or she made in the mid-'70s. The average baseball player makes more than 50 times what he made in the mid-'70s and because of this the Red Sox fan pays 28 times what he used to for a bleacher seat. The increases are similar in the NFL where the average salary is $1.9 million (up from $50,000) and the NBA.

This is what we need to keep in mind when the players self-righteously proclaim that owners wouldn’t pay these salaries if they weren’t making money. The profit come from us, from out of our wallets, in the form of higher ticket prices and beer made more expensive by the cost of a 30-second ad on the Super Bowl.

Now the players want more and the owners don’t want to give it to them.

I don’t know which side is right and which side is wrong, but I am absolutely certain of two things:

1. I don’t have any more to give.

2. They don’t care.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 10:39 am
$90k of taxpayer money to pay for a horse shoe pit should be used for a fund to help people fixRead More their properties, or to give scholarships to children or to maintain infrastructure....for the good of the whole. What a frivolous waste of taxpayer money.
George Slate May 24, 2013 at 10:34 am
Earlier this week I sent copies of your Patch comment, and my come back comment, regarding theRead More Newsweek ranking of High Schools in the USA, to Dr. Villar's assistant. Yesterday I got back a message that includes, in part, "I have attached WHS’s application to Newsweek America’s Best High Schools 2013 as requested. Also, please see Dr. Villar’s comments below regarding the application:" Since I did this for your benefit, please call me, my phone number is published, give me an E-mail address to send this to, and I (all of us in Patch land) look forward to your analysis of the application. Thank you, in advance, for your service in this regard.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 12:53 pm
When people post on Windsor Patch, they are not having a personal, one to one conversation. If youRead More want to do that, send each other emails.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 12:52 pm
Property values affect taxing. The mill rate is 70% of the assessment. Tax revenue goes down ifRead More homes lose their value. This is usually followed by increasing the mill rate to make of the difference. We also can't let the school budget suck up all revenue without regard to other needs that must be met. We have a good budget when most people feel it is fair to all. That is when they will vote 'yes'.
Mary Ann Overbaugh May 24, 2013 at 12:15 pm
By trying to correct me on my opinion. His opinion is his opinion....we all get to have one.
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
Al Simon May 24, 2013 at 08:38 am
It is an excellent question. Maybe we should study it? Oh, wait.....
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions