.
Feedback

Greater Awareness of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Sports Means Better Reporting

But my money says that in 30 years, we will look back at this era and wonder why we let it go on as long as we did.

There were nearly 100,000 more reported traumatic brain injuries in youth sports in 2009 than 2001, a 60 percent increase, according to a report released Thursday by the Center for Disease Control.

The good news is our games may not really be more dangerous.

“We believe that one reason for the increase in emergency department visits among children and adolescents may be a result of the growing awareness among parents and coaches, and the public as a whole, about the need for individuals with a suspected TBI to be seen by a health care professional,” Dr. Linda C. Degutis, the director of the CDC′s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, said.

The bad news is there is increasing medical evidence suggesting even a single traumatic brain injury, such as a concussion, can induce long-term changes in the brain similar to those found in people with neurodegenerative disease, according to a study by doctors at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Glasgow and Southern General Hospital in Glasgow, Scotland.

Now, this is not the same thing as saying that a single concussion leads to Alzheimer’s, but it does signal the need for proper diagnoses and treatment. Here in Connecticut we are lucky. The state legislature was among the first states to mandate high school coaches undergo training to recognize possible concussions and establish a protocol for treatment. No doubt some high school athletic departments considered this an unfunded mandate but it’s a necessary one. The legislature was negligent in only one regard. The law should have imposed the same mandate on AAU and travel team coaches because such teams take up a larger space in the athletic education of our youth.

So far, 33 other states have joined Connecticut in passing similar bills but again, most of them ignore AAU and travel teams. This is a mistake. The message should be that if you work with kids you need to know how to take care of them.

Meanwhile, 75 former NFL players are suing the league claiming it withheld information about the harmful effects of concussions. The suit, reported first by TMZ, was brought by a group that includes former Giants running back Rodeny Hampton and Dolphins receiver Mark Duper and alleges that the NFL sponsored a study in 1994 that concluded there was no danger from cumulative head injuries.

There is no question the league, which seems to be an unstoppable ratings machine, envisions head injuries as the one issue which clouds its otherwise bright, blue sky. There is good reason for this. If there ever comes a day when doctors can state, with a medical certainty, that playing football increases the chances of, say, dementia by a significant percentage, what parent is going to let their child take up the game?

The medical evidence today is scattered. The evidence tomorrow may be overwhelming.

This is why the NFL has done what it can to cut down on violent hits to the head and have been especially protective of players who touch the ball and, therefore, may be known by the public. Much less attention has been paid to the impact of repetitive, but non-traumatic, blows absorbed by the league’s faceless linemen on each and every play, though medical studies are beginning to ascertain the damage such contact can do.

All of this should give parent’s pause.

On the one hand, we do a disservice to our children when we try to wrap them in bubble wrap when we send them out to play. Skinned knees and sprained ankles are the price of active, healthy children.

But my money says that in 30 years, we will look back at this era and wonder why we let it go on as long as we did. No doubt football holds a central place in our sporting culture. Our sporting culture needs to get over it.

To change football, to remove the violence, is to make it something different from what it is. Already, if you listen to sports talk radio, you can hear the rumblings of those who say the game is too pass happy, too much of a finesse game. These are fans that prefer the ground and pound style of football. They want football that comes wrapped in the big hits that kill the brains of the men who deliver them.

There is money and machismo involved and so there will be resistance to change but change will happen eventually. Either someone will figure out how to make the game safer or parents will stop letting their kids play.

Then one day the CDC will report fewer traumatic brain injuries and you won’t have to go looking for the good news.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions
R Eleveld May 15, 2013 at 01:12 pm
The results:Read More http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/voting-results-by-district-with-analysis
AnneB May 15, 2013 at 09:19 am
What they don't get is that the Dollar Tree and Poquonock development are not isolated issues.Read More They directly relate to the overall frustration of voters. Residents have repeatedly been told that development will produce "benefits" for them and the town and help keep taxes low. Meanwhile, those "benefits" always seem to go to an ever hungry, yet still failing, education beaurocracy while the center of town and other neighborhoods languish with no improvements and taxes still go up.
Malvi Lennon May 15, 2013 at 09:10 am
What Mayor Trinks and Minority Leader Jepson refuse to acknowledge is that people (ALL people) areRead More tired. Most Windsor residents whether they are on the right or the left want cost effective responsible government. We want our elected officials to remember that they ARE accountable to the people. It is OUR money hence OUR priorities should set the agenda. No more horse trails or sidewalks to nowhere. This November let’s send a clear message to the Town Council – step aside boys a new team is taking over.