.
Feedback

Canty Files Finance Complaint Against McGee Campaign

Canty claims a recent $40,000 in contributions to McGee's campaign violate campaign finance guidelines agreed upon by both candidates in the fifth district race for the Democratic nomination.

The Leo Canty campaign filed a campaign finance complaint with the state elections enforcement commission (SEEC) Monday, alleging his fellow Democrat and opponent in the race for the party's fifth district nomination, Brandon McGee, "violated state campaign finance law by benefiting from independent expenditures totaling nearly $40,000 from the Great New England Public Schools Alliance (GNEPSA). GNEPSA is tied to StudentsFirst, the education privatization group headed by Michelle Rhee," according to a statement released by the campaign.

According to SEEC filings, GNEPSA, an organization that names its largest private financial backers in recent months as New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Dr. Steve Perry of Hartford's Capitol Prep, ConnAd and StudentsFirst, has made three independent expenditures in support of McGee since Wed., Sept. 26.

GNEPSA's contributions were given directly to three Washington, D.C.-based organizations (SDK Knickerbocker, Switchboard Communications and Civic Census Group) for canvassing, setting up a phone bank and campaign advertisements.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Canty harshly criticized the contributions Monday, saying, "Brandon's campaign literature focuses on building strong public schools, yet he’s the beneficiary of a shocking and possibly illegal campaign contributions [sic] from a group that wants to destroy our public schools – a group launched by Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital, no less. This is unacceptable on every level.”

While GNEPSA, a group with interests in education legislation, may be working to get McGee's name out, McGee emphasized his independence from the group's actions, Monday.

"I have not received money from anybody. I have no control over contributions," he said, pointing out that candidates, according to campaign finance rules, "have no idea who's contributing or giving to the campaign."

"We have $524 in our account... We're running on little to no money. Everything we're doing now, with hundreds of volunteers, is because people believe in what I stand for," McGee added.

Explaining that he has "no control over organizations looking to advance their own interests," McGee said he sees GNEPSA's involvement, as asserted by others, as an effort against Canty's run for election.

"They're using me to get to him, and it's unfortunate" said McGee. "It's unfortunate that four days before an election... these people can just come out of nowhere and do what they want, and the candidate has no control over it."

Liam Sweeney of the McGee campaign agreed, pointing out that GNEPSA's involvement "is not about Leo and Brandon."

It's about two groups with education interests at stake, said Sweeney, explaining that Canty, who is vice president of Connecticut's American Federation of Teachers (AFT), received financial support from the AFT.

According to SEEC filings, the AFT contributed $1,500 to the Canty campaign through Grassroots Strategies, Inc.

The candidates, Sweeney said, "are caught in a war" between the two groups.

Canty campaign manager Al Simon denounced GNEPSA's support of the McGee campaign, saying the contribution "has nothing to do with issue advocacy and everything to do with stealing the election."

According to state documents, the Citizen's Election Program is a voluntary program, through which eligible candidates receive full public campaign financing. The program, according to the state, was implemented to avoid a candidate's "reliance on special interest money," to relieve candidates of special interest influence, to restore public confidence in government, to aid in public access to campaign finance information and to encourage citizen participation in campaigns.

The Canty campaign alleges the McGee campaign "violated the spirit and letter" of the campaign finance laws and violatedof section 9-703 of the Connecticut General Statutes, which addresses a candidate's agreement to abide by campaign expenditure limits outlined in the Citizen's Election Program.

The linchpin to the allegations made by the Canty campaign, according to complaint filed, is "circulating literature with a picture of Brandon McGee that does not appear on any of his own campaign literature and could only have been obtained by coordination of this expenditure with the McGee campaign."

According to McGee, he learned of GNEPSA's contribution and subsequent allegations of a campaign finance law violation through social media.

Outside of denying any involvement with GNEPSA's efforts, McGee said he's looking forward to finishing a positive campaign.

"My opponent is looking to divide [people]," McGee said in reference to the Canty campaign's allegations. "I can't compete with all the negativity. I'm seeking to bring people together, even and if it takes going through challenging moments like this, and that's what you want in a leader."

Sweeney said the campaign will continue to stick to what has worked: "Old school politics, door knocking and making phone calls."

"It's unfortunate there's a change in tone," Sweeney added, referencing the allegations, "but Brandon and the campaign will remain positive... Brandon and I both have respect for Canty and his campaign."

Canty and McGee will appear on the Democratic ballot during Windsor and Hartford's October 2 primary. In Windsor, voting districts one, two and three (L.P. Wilson, John F. Kennedy School and 330 Windsor Ave.) are open.

The winner of the primary will be named the Democratic party's nominee in the race for fifth district state representative, and will appear on the Nov. 6 ballot against Republican candidate Paul Panos.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tim Curtis May 23, 2013 at 07:48 pm
Dear Michaela Fissel, You gave some very sound and concrete reasons as to the positives about livingRead More in Windsor. And I couldn't agree more. But then you become very vague about what specifically the differences you and your friends have seen in Windsor today. It would be very helpful to be as specific with the negatives as you were with the positives. BOE issues have been a part of Windsor, going back to at least 1984 when we first moved to town. Verbal shouting matches were not uncommon at meetings. But we've worked things out. My suggestion to you would be to visit the schools, talk to the principals and the teachers. Observe a class. Those were the people who sold us on education in Windsor, not the BOE. Tim Curtis
George Slate May 22, 2013 at 06:45 pm
Yes, success has many parents. I truly do not want to taint your story, but my question is: DoesRead More WEF have enough money to fund an EER by a legitimate researcher (or are you willing to start up a collection?)? If you do, maybe in five years you can do a similar story about our High School.
CatherineDennis May 21, 2013 at 08:45 pm
Congrats to all students, parents, teachers and administrators at Sage Park. It would seem thatRead More mission statements, transparency, parent involvement all equal excellence. How much would you charge to teach these basics to those that feel the need to hire college students from Chicago to review WHS-those very same people that congratulated you tonight? The students achievements that were honored tonight were very impressive and you make us all proud. Keep up the great work at Sage Park.
George Slate May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Thank you Al and Bill for the follow up comments. For both, as I understand it, the fancy words are,Read More longitudinal studies. Take the same students, or group of students if the individual data is not available, and see how the test results go from third grade to high school. I've only done a quick scan of the test results for Windsor that R. Eleveld gave us a link to earlier. Along with understanding the Town's audited financial statements (which Bill might help me with), this longitudinal information is something that I hope to work through as time permits. As I write this, I should consider a FOI to see if it already exists. If it already exists, I'm surprised that all of us do not already have easy access to it. When I have the information gathered, I will share summaries here. And for the two of you, I will share the detailed spreadsheets. As I recall, even last night the conversation centered on the High School for turn around, and regardless of what we think of the person currently engaged for the EER, the EER is for the High School only.
Bill Generous May 21, 2013 at 04:46 pm
George, keep in mind that after middle school at Sage Park, some students go to other public orRead More private high schools. Studies comparing the middle and high school should concentrate on students that have attended both.
Jeanneen Griffin, First Vice President and Team Leader, Commercial Real Estate Lending for First Niagara's New England and Tri-State Regions
Albert Williams May 20, 2013 at 03:40 pm
Just curious...any relation to Griffin Land, Imperial Nursuries, River Bend Associates?
R Eleveld May 21, 2013 at 03:44 pm
@Slate The BoE originally said they did not believe the Town Ethics Commission had purview over theRead More BoE. Yes in November the voters can choose to continue the behavior with the current party in the majority. See the comment of WR who says a Councilor accepted responsibility here: http://windsor.patch.com/groups/schools/p/council-approves-reduction-in-education-funding
George Slate May 20, 2013 at 02:27 pm
R Eleveld - Just to clarify, The Town Ethics Committee ruled (1) that the BOE is subject to the TownRead More Ethics Code, but (2) they do not have jurisdiction over violations of BOE by laws violations. When someone is brought in front of an Ethics Committee, and comes out vindicated, one of two things happen. They are humbled, or emboldened. The BOE President, and the Superintendent of Schools are emboldened because virtually nothing stands in their way of two person absolute rule, until November 2013. The only obstacle is for one of the Democrat BOE members joining the other four BOE members to reign (the pun works all too well here) them in (this appears unlikely). What is the old saying, Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? So we have to wait until November to try and fix this situation. In the meantime the voters in Windsor can keep voting NO on the referenda to send the message that we do not want dysfunctional BOE oversight. Or we could get back a functional BOE. Since September 12, 2012, this possibility grow less likely each day.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:18 am
@Michele, you are correct. The TC can only provide the BoE an amount of money, it can not in anywayRead More tell the BoE what to do with that money. It could make suggestions, however they carry the same weight as any citizen making any suggestion to the BoE. State law has created the BoE as an island unto itself. They do not even think they are subject to the Town Ethics Code. The voters do have the power to change what they do not like in November. The question is will they again repeat the prior behavior and vote in those that will not make change. Remember Einstein's definition of insanity. It applies here.
R Eleveld May 20, 2013 at 10:22 am
They did a good job of investigation along with Ms. Fissel. in the article: Some investigationRead More yields more questions. I ask some questions about the timing of this whole situation. It is now become an embarrassment to Windsor, Loyola, and Dr. James. The idea of this research/study is important, however this execution is fraught with problems and serious concerns. http://windsor.patch.com/groups/r-elevelds-blog/p/some-investigation-yields-more-questions